iPads DO belong to today's classrooms
   What a headline. Alas, it doesn’t quite do the post justice; They  actually raises a few valid points on the potential woes of digitally  assisted learning, but they’re lost under a headline that (falsely)  paint them as some sort of Luddite.
iPads absolutely have a place in the classroom. It’s just a matter of finding a balance. 
Let me tell you a bit about my childhood.
I grew up in an interesting place, in an interesting time. My  (relatively) small town was about an hour outside of main city — just  close enough to the glowing core of the city as to feel its  warmth, but far enough that you always wondered if you were actually a  part of it. For every  tech millionaire who chose my town as their escape, there were two  nth-generation locals with calluses for hands and sweat for blood. It  made for an interesting crowd.
By the time I hit gradeschool, computers were by no means rare in my area. While they still weren’t  nearly as ubiquitous as they are today, I was lucky enough to be coming  in just as the late 90′s explosion of computers into education had begun  to pay off. Most (but not all) classrooms had one, and the teachers  knew how to use them. By second grade, computers were deeply intertwined into our curriculum.
 The BASIC programming classes that came later were the foundation for  the programming and web design work I did to avoid getting a real job in Jadavpur University, and the early introduction to technology acted as a spark  for my still-burning desire to learn as much about it as I possibly can.  I consider myself a part of the first generation born and raised with  keyboard in tow, and I love it.
Even in my little town located but a stones throw from the core,  there was some resistance to letting computers make their way into  schools. 
“What if it becomes a crutch? I want my kids to know how to actually do math, not push buttons.” 
This is a matter of curriculum, not the tools used. If a kid leaves  knowing how to solve a math problem (or whatever challenge) using a  calculator (or in this case, iPad) but turns to stone when the  calculator is taken away, it’s because something in the teaching process  was broken, not because the calculator was introduced.
That’s not to pretend that I’m some sort of math wiz regardless of my  computer-heavy upbringing — quite the contrary, in fact, and that’s  part of the reason I’m comfortable waxing on about this topic.
With a connected device in hand, I am a demigod. With a universe of  knowledge at my fingertips, I am all-knowing. 37th President of the US? boop boop boop Nixon! Math problems? More like math LOL–BREMS. Bear attack? Don’t sweat it guys: If we’ve got signal, I’ve got this.
Take away my device, and I am a shadow of my former self. Dewey  decimal system? I didn’t need that book anyway. Math proof? More like  math POOF IM OUT. Drop me off in the middle of a forest, and I’m bear  food by sun down. 
I am the kid people worries about. But I’m okay with that — and I don’t  blame my computer, or my calculator, or my iPhone. I don’t blame my  teachers, either; it’s a weird, ever-evolving world we live in, and  hindsight is 20/20. In the end, it’s no one’s fault but my own that I  can’t recall how to do all of this stuff sans gadgetry.
With that said, I honestly believe it’s entirely possible — nay, crucial  — to teach a kid to live both with and without technology. Teach and  test them on how to do it the hard way (and more importantly, to  understand the underlying concepts)… then drive it in with technology.  If you instill a sense of pride in doing things with your very own  brain, perhaps all that junk won’t fly out the window as soon as the  diploma is signed. It’s all about balance.
“But they’ll be so distracting!”
Of course they will! Anything you put in front of a kid, if they have  no interest in being there, is a distraction. Paper and pencil? Doodle  time! Science book? Let’s scan the index and try to find pictures of  boobs! Graphing calculator? Don’t even get me started.
Here’s the thing: true attention is binary — you’re either paying  attention, or you aren’t. Being distracted by an iPad is no worse than  being distracted by anything else. Again, it all comes down to the  teacher and how they use the tools at hand. If you can get away with  playing Infinity Blade II  in class on a 9.7″ display,  your teacher probably isn’t paying much attention either.
“But what possible value do they actually add?”
Instant feedback, tailored to a kid’s learning style. The physical  metaphor in touch interaction. Enjoying learning, even when the kids  don’t realize they’re learning. Portability. Share-ability. (And, to go  slightly tangential for a second, security. It’s a lot harder for a kid  to accidentally bork the iPad’s software then it is to demolish a  computer running XP/IE.) To say a tablet adds nothing over books, or  even over a more traditional computer, is incredibly short-sighted.
“But they cost so much! There’s no way Mr X can afford these”
Technology is expensive, period. Just as not every school district  got computers at the same time, not every school district needs to get  tablets right away. Those that can afford to experiment can — and  should. When Mr X can afford them in a way they feel is beneficial  to their curriculum, they should. Whether that means one tablet per  student, a tablet lab, a roaming tablet cart, or a single shared  presentation tablet isn’t set in stone. One school using a new tool and a  new teaching method doesn’t antiquate all that came before it for  everyone else— and regardless of Apple’s announcement today, school  books aren’t going anywhere any time soon,
(Oh, and given Apple’s history with schools and little details like  all of today’s new stuff being compatible with the original iPad: if you  think Apple’s not going to find a way to push iPads into schools on the  cheap, you’re crazy)
Tablets, like their bigger desktop computer brethren, aren’t going  anywhere. Nor are touch interfaces. 
For a kid entering Kindergarten this  year, tablets and other portable form factors will likely be as big a  part of his life as any other computing device. If school is a place for  learning, it’s our duty to surround kids with the technology that will  empower their lives. We must teach them a deep comprehension of the  world around them, but also how to traverse its challenges in the most  efficient of ways. Teach technology as a means of efficiency, not a  means to an end — find the balance.
Cheers...
Arjun
Comments